Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan Nicole (singer)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete per Wikipedia:Csd#G4 'DELETE' Toddst1 (talk) 06:01, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Megan Nicole (singer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Youtube celebrity who does not appear to have garnered the appropriate level of reliable sourcing in independent sources that is required for a wikipedia article. Google is full of her social media and non reliable sources. Google news is just mentions of her performing in other events (i.e. listings). Unless the sourcing is dramatically improved we need to remove this article. Spartaz Humbug! 04:54, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. Has been deleted in the past month via AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan Nicole. Agree with all the delete votes... a case of Too Soon. Also needs some salt. Bgwhite (talk) 05:37, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Salt this entry and the Megan Nicole entry. Given that this is the sixth or seventh time this has been deleted, this absolutely needs salting. It'll just be re-added and waste more time getting speedied or deleted again, leading to the necessity for salting. Best to just do it now.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:56, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Probably not notable. There are others just like this floating around of course, but the sourcing usually at least looks better. When I created Austin Mahone it had been deleted many times before, so that's not dispositive.--Milowent • hasspoken 05:57, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.